DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
BC
Docket No: 00530-14
14 August 2014
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 13 August 2014. Your allegations of error and
‘injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
Support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes,
regulations, and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
You entered a commissioning program at the Naval Academy on 2
July 2008. You failed to complete the course of instruction and
were informed that administrative separation processing had been
initiated. On 24 April 2012, you elected to provide monetary
recoupment in lieu of active duty service, acknowledging your
debt of $166,788.51. Subsequently, on 11 June 2012, you were
discharged with an honorable characterization of service
discharge and assigned an RE-3K (disenrolled from Naval Academy
or other officer program) reentry code.
The Board noted that applicable regulations provide that an
RE-3K reentry code is the most favorable and waivable code that
may be assigned to individuals who are separated by reason of
_being disenrolled from a commissioning program. The alternative
is an RE-4 (not recommended or retention) reentry code.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
Material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
“a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
*consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
(SAR.
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1093 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 July 2014. The Board noted that applicable regulations provide that an RE-3K reentry code is the most favorable code that may be assigned to individuals who are separated by reason of being disenrolled from a commissioning program. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08445-10
Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, the Board concluded that you were correctly assigned the RE-3K reentry code due to your request to be disenrolled from OCS.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03915-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 December 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board noted that an RE-3K reentry code is waivable and is the most favorable you could have received under your circumstances.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04231-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 January 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7144 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In this regard, you were assigned the most favorable reenlistment code based on your circumstances. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5242 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2014. As such you agreed to enlist in the Navy Reserve fora period of eight years and complete eight weeks of basic military training prior to enrollment in the BOOST Program... You were advised and acknowledged that failure to complete BOOST for any reason, other than misconduct, could result in discharge and that if disenrollment from it was due to...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02117
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02117 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, Block 27, Reentry Code be changed from 4L, which denotes Separated commissioning program eliminee (OTS, AECP, and so on) to a code suitable for reentry into the armed services...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00354-10
The Board found there was no injustice in the decision to disenroll you from the Naval Academy and there was no error or injustice in the decision to require full reimbursement for the educational costs expended on your behalf. The Board found that the regulations governing your attendance at the Naval Academy provide that a Midshipman who fails to complete the program requirements shall, at the discretion of the Secretary of the Navy, either serve on active duty for a specified period or...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03219
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03219 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 3 Apr 08 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry code be changed from 4L to a code that would allow him to continue his career in the US Air Force. Additionally, the Board also concluded the USAF Academy Cadet Sanctions...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-03219
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03219 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 3 Apr 08 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry code be changed from 4L to a code that would allow him to continue his career in the US Air Force. Additionally, the Board also concluded the USAF Academy Cadet Sanctions...